The Very Near Future of the Web Part 5 – Enterprise 2.0

by Sherry Heyl

I have the great privilege to be the founder and Chair of the TAG Enterprise 2.0 society. We are currently in the process of planning our 3rd year. Yet each planning meeting still starts with the question “What is Enterprise 2.0?”

Is Enterprise 2.0 about

I personally am in agreement with Dion Hinchcliffe‘s image of Enterprise 2.0

Over the past few years we have witnessed a tremendous increase in organizations integrating social media tools and trends within their marketing mix.

Inc. recently posted a survey that found;

social media usage by companies on the Inc. 500 has grown in the past year, with 91 percent of companies reporting that they use at least one social media tool, compared with 77 percent of companies surveyed in 2008.

The increased adoption of social media can be attributed to many forces, including;

  • Reputation management as more and more customers talk about brands online.
  • Perceived reduction in cost for marketing during the recent economic downturns.
  • Peer pressure as more and more companies boast of success from their social media efforts.

However the adoption of social media tools for internal collaboration has not been as widespread as social media marketing, yet.

The pressures for people to change how they communicate internally have not been as strong as they were when customers began openly voicing their ideas and opinions externally. Internally employees are focused on their task at hand with the tools that are available to them with little time to experiment with new tools or processes. Not to mention the need to get executive buy-in to change processes or even buy-in from the team.

Most enterprise adoption of social software for internal collaboration has come after the sell of a “solution” from the various vendors. Although there are various success stories such as Transunion saving $2.5 million is less than 5 months using social software, often organizations find their new social platforms are ghost towns. The reason is it takes time, effort and a compelling reason for people to change their behavior, and to date, the compelling reasons have not been well known.

So, what is changing that puts Enterprise 2.0 as one of our “Near Future of the Web” topics?

The unemployment rate.

This year unemployment went into the double digits. Everyday there was news of mass layoffs. New jobs were hard to find and many new jobs that were listed were asking for some knowledge of social media. People joined sites such Twitter, Facebook, and of course LinkedIN to find the hidden job market and to update their skills. The masses on the job market had both the time and very compelling reasons to learn new skills that would change their behavior.

New hires of experienced professionals are now becoming as savvy with social software as the Millennials entering the job force. Any organization that has not begun to implement a strategy and guidelines for social software behind the firewall may find themselves facing grassroots efforts that happen with the best of intentions, but may ultimately sacrifice the organizations intellectual property, reputation, as well as create a culture of cliques that include those who are “in the know” and those who “do it the way it has always been done.”

This is why unlike social media, which had its origins as a grassroots movement, Enterprise 2.0 needs to be led from the top. Social software is free and readily available to be implemented by employees for the personal or project based uses. More often than not, there is not need or desire to let potential detractors know about these efforts. This in turn, increases the number of knowledge silos, compromises intellectual property, and potential could cause irrefutable damage.

The benefits of an Enterprise 2.0 initiative are numerous including;

  • Deeper insight into who the talent is within the organization
  • Ability to immediately dispel rumors and misinformation
  • Collaboration among the various departments
  • Capturing and nurturing innovative ideas
  • Increasing knowledge retention
  • Creating a sense of community within the organization

However, an Enterprise 2.0 initiative is not going to be successful without the right purpose and strategy moving it forward. These initiatives need to be aligned with the direction of vision of the organization, and that typically comes from the top.

The biggest challenge organizations face right now is not the fluctuating stock market or the lack of productivity from your employees hanging out on Facebook.

The biggest challenge organizations face right now is lack of timely insight into the needs of their employees and the needs of their customers.

The future is flying toward us at an unprecedented speed and without the tools needed to see what is ahead as well as what is right in front of us many organizations might find themselves lying in a landfill of fossilized businesses.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Who Should Own Social Media

It is a debate that has been going around for as long as social media has been recognized as a force; “Who should own social media?”

I recall times when the debates got ugly between mainstream media and bloggers. The question on the table was who should own the news, who was the most credible. From my perspective the answer was not black and white, bloggers vs mainstream media. It seemed obvious that both bloggers and mainstream journalist had a co-dependent relationship and that they often shared an audience and beyond that, the audience often added their voice to the reports.

For a long time I have also seen the debates between PR and Interactive Marketing. PR is in charge of managing reputation, creating buzz, and shaping the message. Interactive marketing is in charge of selling and serving the customer via the various channels on the web. For over a decade most online communications came from one direction. Now, as we all know, customers are talking back to the institutions as well as talking to each other. Through the years 2005-2007 I spoke with several PR professionals who had one question; “How do we control the message?” The answer was that you can’t. But you can manage the message based on how the customer is served and how the relationship is managed. To me that means that PR and Interactive Marketing are now dependent on each other.
Since the reputation of a company is at the mercy of how well customer service is executed, we now have CRM professionals staking their claim on social media. When a company such as United Airlines, makes the  wrong person, such as Dave Carroll, feel like he is not a valued customer, amazing things can happen, such as a music deal for Dave and lots of lost revenue and a damaged reputation for United.

It seems that customer service representatives need to be on top of their game more now than ever, and they need to know how to pro actively address customers where they are seeking answers. Organizations like the ACVB currently have their customer service representatives spending time answering questions that are posted throughout the web. Best Buy has established a very active online customer service army.

Advertising has also been very active in looking at ways they can be part of the conversation within social media, how they can track customer interest, and what is the trick to going viral?

Sales professionals have become active in participating in a variety of online networks to identify and learn more about their clients, prospects and competitors.

Human Resource professionals have leveraged social media sites for recruiting and to check the reputation of current and future employees. More often than not Human Resources is also being tasked with creating employee guidelines related to participating in social media.

Considering there are so many departments involved in social media, it seems that the next big tidal wave in the world of social media that is starting to hit is Enterprise 2.0. The use of social software to communicate internally, to be able to react to the market quickly as well as develop unified proactive plans.

This past week I delivered my presentation, Mapping Corporate Goals with Social Media Trends and Technologies, to the International Society for Performance Improvement.

This was the second time I have delivered this presentation and both times it has been very well received. In fact my favorite feedback of all time came from a senior manager that attended the presentation. He said he finally is starting to understand social media, that it needs to be a corporate wide strategy not just a PR or Advertisement initiative. It was a very rainy night that night, but I believe the clouds parted and the stars shined down when he said that.

It took some time, but most people finally understand that social media cannot be controlled. Now if only we can realize it also cannot be owned.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Who’s Afraid of Enterprise 2.0?

By Sherry Heyl

This past week I led the second session of our online classes, which was Advanced Internet Syndication (optimizing your content). As I was discussing how search was changing,from Google’s personalized search initiative to more and more people finding content through peer networks such as Digg, StumbleUpon, and Del.icio.us the question came up about how to manage these trends on an Enterprise level.

The very real concern is that the way we search and store information as well as the way we communicate is rapidly changing, but because of the perceived and sometimes real threats from these changes, many Enterprises have been very slow to adapt.

What is Enterprise 2.0?

Wikipedia defines Enterprise 2.0 as;

Enterprise social software, also known as Enterprise 2.0, is a term describing social software used in “enterprise” (business) contexts. It includes social and networked modifications to company intranets and other classic software platforms used by large companies to organize their communication. In contrast to traditional enterprise software, which imposes structure prior to use, this generation of software tends to encourage use prior to providing structure.

I would add that sometimes use of these tools are happening without encouragement.

A couple of months ago I wrote about How Social Media Became a Speeding Bullet. The basic premise was that social media entered into our lives and our daily communications without many of us even realizing what was going on. For the most part we did not have to pay for anything or buy new equipment to start participating, we just had to stumble across a site through the course of our Internet surfing and start participating.

A couple of weeks later I asked the question  Is the Intrusion of Social Media in the Workplace Inevitable?

Considering more and more people are realizing the benefits of such tools as Wikis, Blogs, RSS, Chat and more, it would seem logical that they would want to utilize  those tools in the workplace.

However, implementing the tools behind the firewall is not as easy as stumbling into social media as you surf the web. IT departments have some very real concerns about what those tools allow you and others to do. In the eyes of those responsible for protecting the company’s information, Enterprise 2.0 in the wrong hands can blow the information security walls down.

Two years ago the Enterprise Web 2.0 blog posted 10 questions and concerns on the minds of organizational leaders. Each question is still very valid today.

Technological Barriers

1.  How can I be certain that the information that is gathered and shared behind the firewall stays behind the firewall?

2.  How do I control who has access to particular levels of  information and databases?

3.  How do I protect the integrity of the information from malicious tampering by disgrunted employees or managers?

4.  How can I be sure that information is being “tagged” properly for efficient retrieval later?

5.  What kind of training do employees need before they can effectively use the technology?

Cultural Barriers

6.  How can I monitor the system to make certain that what individuals are saying and sharing reflects company policy?

7.  What are the legal dangers in saving and sharing so much loosely supervised input?

8.  How do I distinguish “productive” use of the technology from horsing around?

9.  How do I “manage” the gathering and disseminating of so much unstructured information?

10.  How do I know if I’m getting my money’s worth out of the investment in technology?

I think the first hurdle is to find the champions of change to explore these questions with.

What I have found is that the biggest champion of change can be the Human Resource Executive, the Quality Officer, or the Head of Strategic Planning.

An Enterprise 2.0 strategy can be successful if the organization;

  1. Has buy-in from more than one department (ideally has executive buy-in).
  2. Has a recognized need to share information across multiple departments.

The benefits of a successful Enterprise 2.0 strategy include:

  1. Real-time stream of insight from internal and external sources.
  2. Consumer intelligence across departments
  3. The ability to quickly improve service or enhance products
  4. A consumer focused business process
  5. Appropriate allocation of personnel and resources
  6. Cross functional collaboration
  7. Insights into company culture
  8. Placing the right people in the right roles

How can these benefits help the bottom line? By helping each person in an organization respond to the needs of the marketplace and keeping employees on the frontlines of service.

Chris Heuer does a great job of explaining the importance of responding to the conversations happening in the external marketplace.

Social Media is not just about how an enterprise does its marketing, but how all the people in the enterprise talks with its market.

Yes there is an internal employee to external stakeholder communications path, but there is also a collaboration element added to this – a social sense of working together for common goals. To be really successful however requires more then proficiency with this one aspect of managing your organization. It also requires you to develop deeper expertise with your communications and collaborations process between employees; between employees and partners; and even in some cases between external stakeholders and other external stakeholders.

This includes marketing, customer support, product development, research, partner relationships, internal collaboration, information technology, and even facilities. There is no aspect of your organization that will go untouched. This is not some pie in the sky vision of a far off utopian future, this is what many people/consumers are clamoring for. Tired of being sold to ant talked at, advertising is less effective then ever before and efforts are underway to turn CRM upside down in favor of VRM (Vendor Relationship Management) .

This is not a novel idea. As more and more Enterprises are realizing and taking advantage of these benefits, the organizations that continue to live in fear may find that they will be left behind.

However the real challenges to the organization lies in the inability to create a effective Enterprise 2.0 strategy.

Challenges:

  • The absence of a major and visible crisis
  • Too many visible resources
  • Low overall performance standards
  • Organizational structures that focus employees on narrow functional goals
  • Internal measurement systems that focus on the wrong performance indexes
  • A lack of sufficient performance feedback from external sources
  • A kill-the-messenger of bad news, low-candor, low-confrontational culture
  • Human nature, with it’s capacity for denial, especially if people are already busy or stressed.

The best way for an Enterprise 2.0 advocate to create urgency is to show examples where;

  • Profits up but marketshare down
  • A new competitor is showing signs of becoming more aggressive
  • Opportunities through new technologies and a new market share
  • A new decision-making process is required because no one individual has the information needed to make all major decisions or the time and credibility needed to convince lots of people
  • A new decision-making process must be guided by a powerful coalition that can act as a team.

The advocate(s) needs to identify statements that say – this is how the world is changing, and here are compelling reasons why we should set these goals and pursue these initiatives to accomplish the goals.

A good vision statement acknowledges that sacrifices will be necessary but makes clear that these sacrifices will yield particular benefits and personal satisfactions that are far superior to change.

  • If the vision is made real, how will it affect the stakeholders?
  • For those who are satisfied today, will this keep them satisfied?
  • For those who are not entirely happy today, will this make them happier?
  • For those not involved now, will this attract them?
  • In a few years, will we be doing a better job than the competition?

Feasibility means that a vision is grounded in a clear and rational understanding of the organization, it’s market environment and competitive trends. This is where strategy plays an important role. Strategy provides both a logic and a first level of detail to show how a vision can be accomplished.

So, how do we overcome the fears of Enterprise 2.0?

  • Show that there is more to be afraid of if we ignore the emerging trends of Enterprise 2.0.
  • Identify Information silos within the organization that prevents collaboration
  • Identify vulnerabilities due to unauthorized use of social media.
  • Create strategic recommendations for implementing social media technology that meets the organization’s needs.
  • Create a cross-functional team to plan the merger of data across business units
    • The Coalition consists of:
      • formal titles and/or roles
      • information expertise
      • reputations and relationships
      • capacity for leadership
  • Set qualitative parameters for evaluating performance
    • create a catalogue of touch points for processes, information sources, data, and reporting for branding, channel types and key accounts.
  • Develop networks and an infrastructure for information sharing across functions and brands
  • Establish a “information intelligence”unit to ensure information is being integrated into real-time actionable solutions.
  • Technical Considerations including secure data, and a technology infrastructure, data-mining and analysis that can inter-operate with existing and future technologies.

Defined structure and purpose for the selected media

Develop recommended Guidelines to:

  1. Encourage Participation
    1. Communicate a sensible vision.
    2. Make structures compatible with the vision.
    3. Provide the needed training.
    4. Metrics that will influence employee performance reviews, development plans, and compensation.
    5. Short-term goals and milestones.
  2. Enforce/Modify HR Guidelines
  3. Protect the Organization’s Reputation
  4. Protect Intellectual Property
  5. Process for tracking internal organizational intelligence

From the Outside – In

  1. Track consumer conversations
  2. Identifying types of consumer analysis that will benefit various functional units and departments (identifying emerging issues and trends)
  3. Cross functional guidelines for listening to and responding to consumers.
  4. Data-warehousing and dashboard recommendations
  5. Opportunities for an open business model to collaborate with external partners.

Taking these long a drawn-out steps not only will ease the fears of Enterprise 2.0, but the will add a bit of structure in what seems like an unstructured new world.


Tapping into the Hidden Talent in Your Office

In November 2005 I wrote In the Spirit of Leonardo Da Vinci.”

I explored the idea that what made Leonardo Da Vinci such a genius ahead of his time was that he was able to explore a variety of disciplines and discover how they are all connected.

I stated that

Technology has made tapping into the spirit of Leonardo Da Vinci possible for anyone who has the desire to do so. Leonardo said that “the desire to know is natural to good men,” and “the knowledge of all things is possible.”

I also questioned why we segment different roles and departments within our corporations.

If the marketing department is not aware of the information that the salespeople are receiving, how do they know how to target their campaign? If salespeople do not get to experience the issues coming through customer service, how do they know what problems to solve? How can PR respond to the public without being in the trenches with the public? How do executives keep fresh and innovative ideas without a constant interaction with the the new hires that are coming in, full of hope, enthusiasm and innovative ideas?

The past few years, we have seen accelerated competition, global competition as well as competition from resourceful entrepreneur’s shaking up the business world as we have known it. We have also seen an acceleration in the competition to find talent. People now have an abundance of opportunities; from innovative companies, to contract/consulting work, to going off on their own. In the late nineties we witnessed a high demand for talent based on the innovations and opportunities that were being explored on the Internet. That was a decade ago. The Internet has matured and has become a part of our lives as well as a portal to unlimited choices and opportunities for the top talent within the workforce.

For a company to thrive, or even survive, it is vital that they attract, retain, train, motivate, and inspire the right talent for the right job.  Companies spend an enormous amount of their profit margin for such efforts. Yet due to an outdated process of segmenting roles and departments and lack of cross pollination of ideas and open collaboration, many organizations miss the hidden talent that they currently have within. Or worse, they lose that talent when the individual is recruited away or steps out on their own to explore the talents that they were not given the opportunity to express at their current organization.

Many organizations are still operating with policies and procedures that were created for the industrial age. Procedures that give everyone a specific task within the “assembly line” of a hierarchal model.

This month’s Wired Magazine has a very relevant article about another “genius” that we need to look to in order to achieve a competitive advantage. In “The World Needs More Rebels Like Einstein” Walter Isaacson states;

At a time when the US, worried about competition from China, is again emphasizing math and science education, Einstein’s genius reminds us that a society’s competitive advantage comes not from teaching the multiplication or periodic tables but from nurturing rebels. Grinds have their place, but unruly geeks change the world. And, as recent research into Einstein’s personal papers shows, there’s no better glimpse into his offbeat creativity than the way he puzzled out the special theory of relativity.

See, Einstein did not follow the rules and do what he was told, he mapped out his own path, which changed the world.

The book Wikinomics provides  numerous examples of how R&D departments are looking to retired Scientists and hobbyists to solve complex problems. Many solutions are actually coming from hobbyists because they have a diverse amount knowledge and skills enabling them to see connections that the scientist who are focused on the problems miss.

So, what changes can an organization make which would enable them to tap into the hidden talent that might exist within their own walls and shift from operating under the industrial model to the digital model?

They can start by allowing employees to feel involved in the decision making and direction of the company. Let them know that their ideas and opinions are being heard and be sure that the organization is capturing that information.

We all learned new ways to communicate in the late 90′s with email, Intranets, and databases. These new forms of communication were an improvement to former ways of communicating (paper memos, meetings that were missed…) However they still have their downfalls of being silos of information, or lost information, or worse, an overload of information that is ignored or inaccurate. Social media has provided the next new wave of communicating and collaborating.

Through RSS feeds, employees are able to “opt in” to ongoing and evolving information/conversations that they are interested in, whether it is within their department or another area that they choose to explore. Departmental blogs allow for an ongoing conversation that enables different people from different departments to collaborate on ideas and explore opportunities or threats. Wikis enable companies to capture the collective intelligence of the team as it grows and evolves. Social Bookmarking enables team members to share and discover new resources and information. Podcasts and interactive videos from the executive team provides a personal touch and community building from the top.

The shift from a rigid industrial model to a collaborative digital organization reduces the loss of both information and talent. When people feel involved and valued, they experience a since of pride and ownership and are therefore motivated and inspired to share their untapped talents, innovations, knowledge and skills. Such an organization will reap the competitive advantage for talent as well as market-share within their industry.


Internal Blogging

by Timothy Moenk

 

Businesses are beginning to understand that as the blogosphere continues to grow, more markets are moving from metaphoric monetary conversations and turning into actual conversations as per the Cluetrain Manifesto.  Even those not participating in social media benefit in that conversations are archived by Google and other search engines resulting in more educated consumers.

There isn’t a lot of buzz yet regarding how blogging can be applied within the organization.  This is largely due to how sensationalistic the media likes to be regarding mainstream blogging.  Internal blogging is boring by comparison, but much more worthwhile than external blogging if effectively incorporated into an organizations internal communications strategy.

Internal blogs are semi-public spaces (behind the firewall)  for individuals within organizations to communicate with each other and share knowledge where appropriate. When done well, internal blogging can help lead towards openness and cooperation that benefit both employees and the organization.  Employees begin to feel they have a voice, and important information can be shared between team members and across departments that might otherwise not be communicated. The idea of internal blogging can also be a cause of discomfort for middle management who fear a loss of control, but it in fact blogging helps to facilitate management styles that are optimal for knowledge work in the 21st century.  Internal blogging can also have the effect of displacing certain types of email communication.  By cutting down on non-critical email, employees are free to perform their work more effectively in places other then the inbox.

“The sanctity of the inbox” is an idea that we like discussing here at What a Concept!  By having separate communication channels that work on different models of attention management (emails are “pushed” to people while blogs are “pulled”) both methods of communication become more effective.  Internal blogging is a perfect fit for organizations who want to move into a 21st model of knowledge/information/attention management.  And given that blogging is as easy as email, once the best practices are put in place internal blogging can become a tool for moving an organizations culture towards one of adaptability, innovation and collective problem solving.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.